Ïã¸ÛÁùºÏ²Ê

XClose

Teaching & Learning

Home
Menu

Transforming feedback practices

Short bite-sized videos from assessment expert, Professor David Boud's Education Conference keynote, in which he inspired colleagues to transform assessment and feedback at Ïã¸ÛÁùºÏ²Ê.

ed_conference_2022_hires_24_web_ready800x500.jpg

18 July 2022

At the 2022 Ïã¸ÛÁùºÏ²Ê Education Conference, delegates were joined online byÌýProfessor David Boud, Alfred Deakin Professor and Foundation Director of the .Ìý

The keynote has been broken down into short videos to share hisÌýideas around the future of feedback, the role of students in feedback processes and how courses can be designed to effectively use feedback.Ìý

This case study may include personal opinions that are not aligned with current Ïã¸ÛÁùºÏ²Ê guidance and policy

Just got 2 minutes? Jump toÌýÏã¸ÛÁùºÏ²Ê support for module and programme design.ÌýÌý

Contents:


Assessment and learningÌý

Assessment must contribute to students’ learning; it gives a message to students about what is really important.Ìý

Do you see assessment as an integral part of student learning?

Local Media Widget Placeholder

Ìý

Shifting feedback from focusing on the input (what teachers do) to the output (what students do)Ìý

Prof Boud suggests a move from thinking of feedback as something that is done to the students by teachers (an input to students), towards a notion of feedback which is about what students do with it (focusing on the output).

Is feedback something teachers provideÌýto students?

Local Media Widget Placeholder

Ìý

Mark justification is not feedback

When we give feedback, we often run two separate ideas together: marking the work against standards and telling the students (grade justification); and enabling the student to move forward. The former is backward looking, the other about where they go from here. Only the latter can be considered feedback, according to Prof Boud.Ìý

What is the difference between ‘grade justification’ and ‘feedback’?

Local Media Widget Placeholder


Focusing feedback on discrepancies between students’ self-assessment and the teacher’s assessmentÌý

Classic approach

A student produces a piece of work and the teacher identifies what they’ve done well and not so well.

Prof Boud’s approach

With the students, he first identifies the features of a good piece of work. Together with their submission, the students self-assess against these criteria. Prof Boud then focuses on commenting on the areas where there is a discrepancy between the students’ and his assessment.Ìý

Can you give an example of how to give feedback?

Local Media Widget Placeholder

Ìý

Students assessingÌýtheir own workÌý

Assessment should equip students to make judgements about their own learning.Ìý

How do we help build our students' ability to judge their own work?

Local Media Widget Placeholder

Ìý

Providing feedback toÌýlarge cohortsÌý

Example of a big course (1500 students) where feedback is in focus. Tutors provide audio feedback on six occasions, which allows them to track changes and improvements during the course.Ìý

How can you provide effective feedback to very large cohorts?

Local Media Widget Placeholder

Ìý

Audio and video feedback

Students appreciate the personal touch of audio and video feedback (using theÌýstudent’s name, talking directly to them). Prof Boud suggests that these types of feedback are very worthwhile.Ìý

What do you think about audio and video feedback?

Local Media Widget Placeholder

Ìý

Impact of receiving feedback

Receiving feedback is not just a cognitive process; it also impacts on students emotionally. So we have to consider that when providing feedback.

Is the impact of feedback mainly intellectual?Ìý

Local Media Widget Placeholder

Ìý

Decoupling grades from feedback

Grades can make students engage less with feedback. So it is a good idea to decouple them and give feedback first.Ìý

Do you think grades and feedback should be decoupled?

Local Media Widget Placeholder

Ìý

The problem with anonymous marking

There’s good evidence that anonymity helps to counter bias in marking. But it’s the opposite we need for feedback. So they work, in a sense, against each other.

When giving feedback, we need to look at the student’s trajectory, for instance by looking at the comments on a previous assignment, as this can help us determine whether the feedback is having an impact (i.e. changing the output).Ìý

What is your opinion on anonymous marking?

Local Media Widget Placeholder

Ìý

The danger of relying on own experiences

We need to own up to the fact that most students today are not like us. What was good enough for us is probably not good enough for students today.Ìý

Why can’t we just continue doing what we’ve always done?

Local Media Widget Placeholder

Ìý

Next steps: programme-level assessment and learning outcomesÌý

We should look at assessment on a programmatic basis, not a module by module level. We need to look more at the programme learning outcomes. We should disentangle thinking about assessment from thinking about learning in modules.Ìý

Where do we begin this transformation of our feedback practice?

Local Media Widget Placeholder

Ìý

Programme-level learning outcomes

Highlighting the importance of programme-level learning outcomes (and how module learning outcomes should relate to these).Ìý

How do you understand the relationship between module and programme learning outcomes?

Local Media Widget Placeholder

Ìý

Designing courses with feedback as the focus

Feedback should not be seen as an add-on. Rather we need to design our courses with feedback in mind right from the start. Feedback is one of only few places where we can adjust our courses in relation to differences between students.

How do you propose centring feedback when designing modules and programmes?

Local Media Widget Placeholder

Designing a programme or module at Ïã¸ÛÁùºÏ²ÊÌý

Get support from the Programme Design unit to design or re-design your academic programme or module(s).Ìý


Last updated: 6 June 2024


Ìý